<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br>It looks like the scholarly publishing community has been hit by its own version of Napster.
<p class="">Over the past year, some 47 million research articles
have been made freely available through a site called Sci-Hub. The
publishing giant Elsevier, aghast at finding many of its articles being
given away, wasted little time in suing the site in federal court for
irreparable damages and copyright infringement “of up to $150,000
(£105,000) per infringed work.” Last autumn, the court granted a
preliminary injunction against the site that succeeded in shutting it
down. Since then multiple versions of Sci-Hub have sprung up on the
darknet, largely beyond the reach of the law. </p><a href="https://goo.gl/8P9WhB">https://goo.gl/8P9WhB</a><br clear="all"></div><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>carlos palombini, ph.d. (dunelm)<br>professor de musicologia ufmg<br>professor colaborador ppgm-unirio<br><a href="http://www.proibidao.org" target="_blank">www.proibidao.org</a><br><a href="http://goo.gl/KMV98I" target="_blank">ufmg.academia.edu/CarlosPalombini</a><br></div><div><a href="http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carlos_Palombini2" target="_blank">www.researchgate.net/profile/Carlos_Palombini2</a><br><a href="http://scholar.google.com.br/citations?user=YLmXN7AAAAAJ" target="_blank">scholar.google.com.br/citations?user=YLmXN7AAAAAJ</a><br></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>